WHY WE DO NOT LIVE IN A SIMULATION

23.10.2024
I think it’s time for a little rant on my part here. I’ve been all too absent…

I’ve noticed the blogosphere clogging up with material about us all living in a simulation. Seems like ever since David Icke released his new book 'The Trap', everyone is jumping on the bandwagon like never before. As if DI is THE expert, suddenly. Now, I like DI, and no doubt he has done wonders to move the needle, exposing the Elite and their plans - but it seems this time they may have gotten ‘into’ him.

I was going to buy the book and read it, but after I started watching interviews and saw his ‘X’ posts to the effect that we need to escape from here and how this is all a trap, I lost my appetite. There are two gaping blind spots in DI’s argument. One is the notion that we are imprisoned here on this planet and need to get out. The other is that we are living in a simulation. So let’s get into those shall we? In doing so, I’m going to be citing a few writings from NEMETA.org pertaining to the subject, which I highly recommend you think about joining btw.

The first argument, that ‘we are trapped here’, imprisoned against our higher self's will on a 'satanic' planet, appears on the surface (and is sometimes claimed) to correspond to a “Gnostic” idea, or so many believe. Icke is obviously not aware that within the Gnostic source material, the Nag Hammadi Library - which by the way is the oldest source material we have of the true Gnostic teachings, representing some of the earliest recorded intel available - is a direct refutation of this idea.

We need to clear something up: There is a version of Gnosticism out there, which most seem to believe is what Gnosticism is all about (myself included BY THE WAY, before I learned otherwise). It is based on early Christian concepts. The idea is that their teachings were somehow erased from history, because the Christian gospels were taking form and materials that didn’t ‘fit’ the Church’s narrative were weeded out to conform with what we have in the bible today. Call it the ‘Valentinian Branch’ of Gnosticism. The sell-out version. I say that because certain people took the writings left for us by the ancient Magian order, and re-wrote them to conform to the emerging Christian beliefs. There are many examples of this.

Probably because certain Gnostics still around at the time, thought it was a good idea to ‘bend the story’ a little - adapt and conform - in order to survive. Better than be slaughtered off by the Christians, I guess. Yes they were doing that. Think that sounds harsh? Read the story of the murder of Hypatia, where on a spring day in the year 415 C.E. a beautiful scholarly pagan noblewoman, having just given a lecture next to the great library of Alexandria, was literally dismembered alive by a fanatical mob of Christian missionaries, headed by ‘Peter the Reader’. Historians have long regarded her death as the event that defined the end of Paganism and the dawn of the Dark Ages. (See 'Not In His Image’ p.5)

There is however another, unadulterated form of Gnosticism, known as ‘Sethian Gnosticism’, in which we find distinct and serious differences. These do not at all conform to the Christian concepts, such as a saviour figure, redemption, salvationism and most importantly, the idea of an off-planet alien god, which was embraced by all of the Abrahamic religions. The Sethians warned us about the mistakes (error) of going this way. That posed a threat to a Judeo-Christian ideology hell bent on following the patriarchal concept of a Supreme Authority that gave mankind limited license on freedom, so long as we conformed to their rule-book of laws. As a result we've ended up being plagued by something called Master Race ideology ever since. It rears its ugly head to this day. Well-suited to the lessons that seem to distinguish the Piscean Age.

And since we now know that this distinction exists, and that scholars have already broken down those differences, is there any excuse to not include it in any serious dialogue or exposé into the topic of simulation? You see, the Sethian Gnostics warned us about what they called HAL - Archontic efforts to use simulation to mislead the human species. They knew about it ages ago. Literally. But I’m getting ahead of myself.

“The earliest clay-tablet writings that survive from around 1800 BCE present an interventionist scenario declaring that the Annunaki have genetically effected human evolution, and the earliest examples of leather-bound books that survive from about 300 CE present a warning not to believe what is found in the Sumerian narratives! Gnostics, upon whose teachings the Nag Hammadi codices are based, warned that alien entities called Archons attempted to meddle in human genetics, but did not succeed. Yet they also warned that it is consistent with the simulation tactics (called HAL in the Coptic texts) of the Archons to make us believe they have powers which in reality they do not have at all.”

—JLL

The Gnostics defined key elements in what is known as the ‘Home Story’, a cosmological creation narrative that encompasses elements which include plasma consciousness, electrical torrents spanning galactic dimensions, and singularity. They identified god-like entities residing at the center of galaxies, in the pleroma, as Aeons. They have super-intelligence and among other things, design evolutionary experiments, such as our Anthropine species. Such concepts, though fantastic, are beginning to emerge in cutting-edge science that define plasma and the electric universe theories.

In a nutshell, our creator was not an angry, jealous man with a white beard in the clouds, but rather, a pair of super-intelligent, super-conscious plasmic torrents with - yes - gender and personality! They designed us to have specific divine endowments, and released humanity as a form of embryonic DNA plasm into the ‘dema’ (matter, dusty plasma) of the galactic arms of the Milky Way, to see how we would emerge under the principles of novelty and free will in a suitable planetary habitat. Once we successfully emerged on this planet - itself an amazing story - we were designed to develop the genius potential placed within our coding and flower into something not even the Aeons could foresee.

How else could there be novelty?

So as you see, the idea is distinctly the opposite of what DI is claiming: it's NOT to get away from here at all! It's actually about claiming our habitat right here on this planet as divinely intended. We also do this in partnership with the Aeon Sophia, who chose to leave the pleroma to eventually turn herself into the planet - literally our Mother Earth. This amazing story is covered in the Fallen Goddess Scenario. I’m not going to get into it here - we’ve put it into the webinar ‘Timecapsule for the Future Past’, narrated by Tonia Madenford, complete with soundtrack and visuals, but it was extracted from specific Nag Hammadi texts. Therefore the idea that we must escape from a ‘prison planet’ is totally inconsistent with the teachings of the Gnostics, who drafted the oldest creation narrative we have, a universal story that embraces all humankind.

Is it because DI and others a) have no idea about this ancient cosmological account? Because b) they know about it, but can’t make it fit the direction of their narrative? Or c) they just don’t agree with the Gnostic perspective? We don’t know and nobody has asked David Icke. But he does indeed cite the word ‘gnostic’ in some of his interviews, with respect to an expression most believe originated out of Gnostic teachings: ‘the divine spark’ in all of us. Unfortunately this is not a Gnostic concept. It’s a Talmudic one. So obviously a) above applies, since I doubt b) would and c) doesn’t make sense since he is quite willing to borrow from Gnostic materials, although unfortunately giving credibility to the wrong version of Gnosticism; call it ‘Valentinian Gnosticism’.

That leads to Point 2: we are all living in a simulation. It's very popular at the moment, but....

Here’s another blind spot for all who are blankly accepting this as a realistic concept: in order to exist, a simulation must simulate ‘something’. So what is it simulating? I have yet to hear any of the discussions talk about that. Is it the true reality? Where is that located? What does that look like? Is it something material and tangible? Or just a better computer program with sexier waitresses and bigger pay-checks? Can you see the problem here? If everyone is supposed to escape from here, where are they going to end up? In the ‘void’ where nobody feels and sees and senses anything but absolute stillness? That sounds like fun! Is there some planet? or holding room? or space station? where ET’s will finally meet us and clear up any misconceptions? Nobody knows.

But the Gnostics did know and they described it to a tee.

And everyone can experience it right now, right here, any time. If you understand that Earth is the destination. Our designated habitat. Never mind the Archons, who were not designed to live here. Nor are they as intelligent as humans. Nor did they genetically modify us to be a ‘slave species’, which is the popular belief many have, cited above. This slave species meme is based on a contrived Annunaki mythology, which claims that superior aliens arrived here on Nibiru, then adapted our genetics in order to be their slaves and mine gold for them (something humans can already synthesise artificially by the way). All of that is based on the mis-translation of a single word by a Yahudin with the name of Sacharia Sitchin. Truth is indeed stranger than fiction.

Excerpt from “Nemeta.org”:

“Jacques Vallee calls the intervention narrative “the myth of contact.” (Messengers of Deception, p. 49) Along with John Keel, who is perhaps his sole equal in subtle analysis of ET/UFO issues, Vallee maintains that the phenomenon conditions our perception of it. It behaves “like a conditioning process. The logic of conditioning uses absurdity and confusion to achieve its goal… If you take the trouble to join me in the analysis of the UFO myth, you will see human beings under the control of a strange force that is bending them in absurd ways, forcing them play a role in a bizarre game of deception.” (p. 7, 20) This is arguably close to how Gnostic texts describe the “tactics” of the Archons:  “They sought to overpower humanity in its psychological and perceptual functions… although they saw that human thinking was superior to theirs… For indeed their delight is bitter and their beauty is depraved. And their triumph is in deception (apaton), leading astray, for their own structure is without divinity.”

(The Apocryphon of John II, 20ff)

So we have people like Icke going on about how we are all living in some simulation, when right in front of our noses we have Gnostic texts that precisely describe such an Archontic deception. Is that not even worth considering? And again, what we see it all boil down to is that WE MUST AGREE to believe the deception. That still doesn’t make it a simulation in the technical sense of some computer program running in which we are NPCs or something like a code running inside the program.

“The Greek/Coptic term plane (PLAH-nay) means “error, leading astray —”mind-bending” in the sense that Vallee suggests. Apaton means “deception,” but to deceive someone into the sense of being defeated is not the same as really defeating them. Or is it? The very danger unique to the Archons consists in their deceptive ploys, rather than in any real power to affect us against our will. As Vallee argues, when we play into the game of deception, we disempower ourselves. This is totally consistent with Gnostic analysis of Archontic intrusion.”

Since nobody on the scene seems to want to go there, or prefers to pretend this highly relevant ancient intel never existed, I will. This is a highly important topic and plays directly into the phenomenon we are witnessing around the world more and more: seemingly instantaneous appearance of things running through your mind. Notwithstanding Project Moldice and the history of the CIA and other three-letter organisations having been exploring the manipulation of the human mind for at least 70+ years. All of it fits perfectly within the Archontic use of technology humans have invented, against us, in order to convince us that we are…slaves…and, by extension, using humans to explain to us that we are living within a simulation and must get out of here. Even though this is our home. WE are the masters here. Sorry. Not the Archons.

“In the terminal phase of behavioral cloning, a powerful fantasy comes into play— but it is just a fantasy. This is the widely hyped claim that artificial intelligence, AI, will replace human intelligence, and humans in the future will become cyborgs. The tool for achieving this goal is IT, informational technology. The presumed outcome of this transmogrification will be AL, artificial life.

This entire proposed development shows how the Dreaming of the Archons intrudes upon the human mind and displaces our species from its proper relation to Gaia’s Dreaming. In reality, the Alien Dreaming is a discarnate fantasy that cannot be realized by humankind because we are an embodied species embedded in a natural habitat, and our self-awareness depends on direct mirroring in nature. However, due to the disease of narcissism (obsession with the socially mirrored ego-self), we are prone to take the Alien Dreaming for a real prospect.

IT is the tool we are using to write ourselves out of Gaia’s agenda. By themselves the Archons can do nothing but insinuate. They rely heavily on our tendency to give over our power by wrong use of imagination. Let’s recall the alchemical teaching quoted in Sources of the Gaia Mythos: “Let thy imagination be guided wholly by nature… And observe according to nature, through whom the substances regenerate themselves in the bowels of the earth. And imagine this with true and not with fantastic imagination.”

There is a distinct separation between the natural world, to which we are connected and from which we emerge, to which we return, and the artificial VR world (Virtual Reality) that Klaus Schwab, Elon Musk, Yuval Harari, Ray Kurzweil, Apple, Meta et al. are promoting and others are describing as the simulation. The transhuman agenda. The ‘inevitable’ merging of humans with machines into a cyborg entity, rendering the natural biological human extinct in a few generations. The Gnostics warned us about the parasitic Archontic intrusion into our minds - specifically the mind of Abraham - via abiogenesis, toxoplasma gondii. Is not the recent invasion tactic of mRNA vaccines exactly that same thing? Which would make it possible for them to live vicariously in our world, and from that position warp human reality away from our destined purpose. If you can’t enter into our world, then get humans to come into theirs.

“Our problem — without question, the single most threatening spiritual problem of our species — is that we do not adequately or consistently distinguish the true from the fantastic imagination. One of the most reliable tactics of the Archons is simulation (hal in Coptic). We might assume, then, that they are capable of simulating life to the point where their simulation cannot be distinguished from the real thing. Not so. The Archons cannot make pearls from plastic, but we can become so dull in sense perception that we cannot distinguish plastic from pearl. Gnostic seers ascertained that Archontic simulation is largely a faking process, like the special effects of the Wizard of Oz. Our alien cousins cannot actually simulate the human organism, but if they can convince us that they can do so, we risk making the simulation look real because we grant it reality in our own imaginations. Gnostics taught that the Archons can do nothing without our complicity—and, in fact, we are the ones who do most of the work for them! The power of human imagination is immense (Gnostics called this faculty the luminous epinoia), and the Archons rely on stealing its inventive fire to pass off their simulations as real.

Consistent with this tactic, the Alien Dreaming seduces us into believing that all kinds of ridiculous things are possible, or even have been achieved already. The fear factor plays beautifully into our inflated expectations. For instance, we live in breathless anticipation that a human being will be physically cloned, perhaps with a little help from our alien cousins on the biotechnological points. Fearing this will occur, or eagerly waiting for it to occur, we do not see what is actually occurring, what is actually happening to us. It is as if we lived in a building under constant threat of an earthquake while acid is silently eating away the foundations. This tactic of distraction, or misdirection, is extremely effective. Consequently, the world today is constantly jolted with the immanence of human cloning, while behavioural cloning proceeds unnoticed.

Common forms of behavioral cloning are: rote learning of religious scriptures (often accompanied by shaking the head, seen with devout Jews at the Wailing Wall, or the entire body, seen in Muslim schools where children are forcefully indoctrinated), conformity to empty religious formulas and vicarious rites (in the Catholic mass, for instance), usage of mobile telephones (involving the same set of gestures around the world: eyes fixed on keyboard to text messages, phone set to ear while walking, eating, driving, etc), flag-waving and slogan-chanting at political rallies, the spiked fingers gesture of heaving masses at rock concerts (Who remembers that at the original Woodstock gathering, Frank Zappa told the immense crowd of hippies, “You are all wearing uniforms.”?), mass gymnastic spectacles in Korea and China, dance crazes and mindless imitation of dance moves modeled by pop idols and mimicked by “Star Academy” candidates, accumulation of designer labels and chic logos, self-cloning via video-game “avatars”….

Furious and unabated, these and other forms of behavioral cloning proceed without the blink of an eye. Indeed, they are encouraged and enforced at every turn, especially where financial gain is at stake. Their effect is to reinforce the zombie mentality that allows them to occur in the first place. The dynamic of behavioral cloning is a classic case of “positive feedback” — an unfortunate designation, however. In the language of complexity theory (formerly, chaos theory) positive feedback is a self-enforcing loop that eventually spins out of control and self-destructs.

On an icy road, when a car begins to slide out of control, the smart driver will steer slightly and steadily in the direction the car’s rear end is shifting, thus correcting the spin. This exemplifies “negative feedback,” but I propose it would be better called corrective feedback. Many of the natural processes on earth, such as the formation of the polar icecaps and the carbon cycle, demonstrate corrective feedback.

If the driver on an icy road panics and makes the seemingly logical move to steer out of the slide (i.e., away from it), the car goes into an uncontrollable spin. This is positive feedback, but I would prefer to call it dystrophic feedback. Dystrophy (from dys-, “abnormal, impaired,” + tropos, “turn.”) is a physical disorder of the limbs characterized by the wasting of organs and tissues, as in muscular dystrophy. Dystrophy — literally, “a turn for the worse” — is more radical than entrophy, which is merely the passive running down of a system. Dystrophic feedback leads to violent disintegration of an organism or machine. In short, it is the path of catastrophic breakdown.

Behavioral cloning is extremely deceptive because the high degree of conformity it demands gives the impression of order and stability. Yet a society driven by behavioral cloning will, sooner or later, enter the path of catastrophic breakdown. Behavioral cloning is the norm in societies where the ruling powers are blindly driven to pathological extremes, such as the Sun sacrifice madness of the Aztecs. As noted above, behavioral cloning is driven from within by belief and lured or entrained from without by technology and trickery (i.e., “magic,” as in the case of Aztec magical ceremonies to feed blood to the dying sun). When beliefs and technology combine, the formula is lethal.

Gnostics taught that the Archons do not autonomously cause us to deviate from our proper course of evolution, but they exploit our tendency to let our errors extrapolate beyond the scale of correction— i.e., to verge on dystrophic feedback. To my knowledge, no other ancient teaching carries such a clear predictive view of the risk of evolutional deviance inherent to human social behavior. The Gnostics may have been silenced 1600 years ago, but they can still speak vividly to us today.”

—JLL

With all the talk about ‘disclosure’ and ETs one day making contact with humanity, or the meme that ETs will become our saviours and help to lock up the evil deep state actors, we have become distracted from the grizzly realisation that the ET invasion may already have happened. We see them staring back at us from the mainstream media, acting on our behalf as political players, embedded within the social circles all around us, posing as our doctors, teachers, authority figures upholding the 'system' - you know, those who demanded you get vaxxed or else you were a terrorist threat to civilisation.

I know this discussion is long from over. Needed to get that out for now. Cheers

—FJ